01451nas a2200193   4500000000100000000000100001008004100002260000900043653001100052653001500063653001900078653001900097653000900116100001900125245005600144300001000200490000700210520104000217       2019                            d  c201910adenial10aDeterrence10aEastern Europe10aHybrid threats10aNATO1 aDarrell Driver00aDeterrence in Eastern Europe in Theory and Practice  a11-240 v183 a<p>This article explores the continuities and changes between Cold War deterrence concepts and approaches and those being employed on NATO’s Eastern flank today. It is argued that classic approaches to deterrence, curated in a rich Cold War intellectual tradition, have been clearly on display in NATO’s responses to Russian aggression and threats, and it is possible to understand the decisions being made in Brussels and Alliance capitals through a consideration of such classical deterrence concepts as deterrence by denial and deterrence by punishment or direct versus extended deterrence. Concepts like these and others explored here remain useful. Nevertheless, important changes in the scope and nature of the threat must be considered, especially as this pertains to non-military aspects of deterrence and so-called hybrid or ‘gray-zone’ threats. This will require a merging of traditional concepts of deterrence with the more recent focus on developing a comprehensive approach to contemporary security challenges.</p>