01030nas a2200193 4500000000100000000000100001008004100002653002200043653001500065653002100080653002300101653002300124653001400147100002100161245004000182300001200222490000700234520059500241 2019 d10acreating profiles10acybercrime10acybercrime roles10adeductive approach10ainductive approach10aprofiling1 aVenelin Georgiev00aProfiling Human Roles in Cybercrime a145-1600 v433 a
This article presents results from a comparative analysis of the applicability of the main methods for developing cybercrime profiles. The criteria used to make the comparison take into account the specifics of the inductive and deductive profiling methods, as well as the particularities of the participants in a cybercrime and its investigation - a cybercriminal, the victim, and detection and investigation officer. The application of profiling for countering cybercrime is substantiated by appropriate profile samples selected in the review of previous studies in the same field.